Elon Musk at the Center of a Fierce AI Talent Competition between xAI, Tesla and Open AI

By Kevin Armstrong
Musk in the middle of AI talent battle
Musk in the middle of AI talent battle
YouTube/NYT Events

In the rapidly advancing realm of artificial intelligence, Elon Musk is embroiled in a unique talent battle as Tesla and his latest enterprise, xAI, vie for the industry's leading minds. The shift of Tesla's computer vision chief, Ethan Knight, to xAI, illustrates a wider movement of key personnel between major tech players. This highlights the intense competition for AI's brightest stars.

While initially poised to join OpenAI, Knight's pivot to xAI adds a twist to the narrative, with Musk downplaying the notion of poaching yet acknowledging the fierce rivalry for top talent. To counter this, Tesla is introducing even more compelling incentives to retain its pioneering engineers."

In response to hundreds of queries and comments on the situation, Musk downplayed the impact of Knight's departure, emphasizing Tesla's robust team of over 200 engineers dedicated to AI and autonomy. Many comments on X suggest Musk is poaching from Tesla as a way to force the company to give him more compensation and voting power. “Musk responded: I (obviously) don’t need (the) money personally, but am concerned about not having voting power that to influence Tesla to do the right thing.” He currently has about 13% of the company but wants 25% control.

Tesla's Countermeasures

Musk himself noted that Knight's decision was influenced by competitive offers from both xAI and OpenAI, hinting at the fierce recruitment landscape Tesla is navigating. Musk's comments highlight a broader narrative, portraying Tesla's ongoing acceleration in autonomy advancements despite the competitive pressures. He acknowledges the AI talent war as unprecedented in intensity, underlining the strategic importance of AI talent for the future of both Tesla and the broader tech industry.

Musk revealed Tesla's strategy to counter-recruitment efforts. The company is not just matching the lucrative offers from rivals but also innovating its compensation structure. By tying compensation increases to progress milestones, Tesla aims to foster a culture of achievement and progress.

The Underlying Talent War Dynamics

The movement of high-profile engineers like Ethan Knight highlights a deeper competition for AI supremacy. With xAI successfully enticing several Tesla engineers, concerns arise over potential conflicts of interest and the implications for Tesla's Full Self-Driving (FSD) technology. The talent war is not just about compensation but also about the direction of AI development. It reflects a broader industry trend where the demand for AI expertise far outstrips supply, leading to aggressive recruitment strategies and significant shifts in talent.

Tesla's ability to continue its pace of innovation in AI and autonomy will depend on its success in navigating this talent war, balancing the need to retain key personnel with the drive to push the boundaries of technology. As the battle for AI talent rages on, Tesla has to balance stability and the pursuit of groundbreaking advancements with its strategies and responses, shaping the future of autonomous driving.

Tesla Denied “Robotaxi” Trademark for Autonomous Vehicles

By Karan Singh
Not a Tesla App

Tesla’s plan to brand its autonomous network of taxicabs has found an interesting little snag. The US Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) has issued a “nonfinal office action” regarding Tesla’s application to trademark the term “Robotaxi” specifically in connection with autonomous electric vehicles.

This is an initial refusal by USPTO’s examining attorney and is very particular for autonomous electric automobiles. A separate trademark application by Tesla for the term “Robotaxi” as it relates to its upcoming autonomous ride-hailing service is still under examination and has not yet received a similar rebuttal.

Understanding the Refusal

A “nonfinal office action” means the USPTO has found potential issues with the trademark application, as stated, which prevents its immediate approval and subsequent granting to Tesla. Tesla now has a three-month period to file its counterarguments and address the USPTO's concerns. 

If Tesla’s response satisfies the examiner, the trademark could be granted.

While the exact content of the office action isn’t detailed in the initial report, such refusals for terms like “Robotaxi” often occur if the USPTO considers the term “merely descriptive” or “generic” for the goods in question. In this particular context, “Robotaxi” could refer to any autonomous taxi vehicle. 

Trademark law generally prevents the exclusive registration of terms that competitors would need to use to describe their own similar products. For a term to be trademarked, it typically needs to be distinctive and act as a brand identifier rather than just a descriptive name of the product’s class or type.

Separate Application for Ride-Hailing

Tesla still has a distinct, separate, and still pending application to register “Robotaxi” as a trademark for “transportation services, namely, autonomous ride-hailing services.” The criteria for trademarking a service can differ from those on trademarks for goods, and it’s possible Tesla may have more success securing the name for the service itself, which would allow them to brand the network as “Tesla Robotaxi.”

Why This Matters

Securing a trademark grants exclusive rights to use a brand name in conjunction with specific goods or services. This helps prevent customer confusion and to protect the brand identity.

If the refusal for the vehicle trademark becomes final, Tesla may be limited in its ability to exclusively name a good (specific vehicle) the “Tesla Robotaxi.” Other manufacturers could also potentially use “robotaxi” descriptively for their own autonomous taxi vehicles.

The ability to trademark “Robotaxi” for the ride-hailing service is arguably more critical for Tesla, as they’re working to establish a unique brand for their autonomous transportation network, which kicks off in Austin next month.

The USPTO’s office action won’t hinder Tesla’s ability to develop or deploy its own vehicles in June - instead, it’ll just impact how Tesla can brand the app and their vehicles, which could cause some last-minute delays if they have to rebrand.

Cybercab and Robovan/Robobus Trademarks

While Tesla is facing challenges with the broader Robotaxi term for vehicles, the company is also seeking to trademark “Cybercab,” “Robovan,” and “Robobus.” Securing a less descriptive name for the vehicle itself often has a higher chance of success with USPTO, as it is far more distinctive than a more general term like “robotaxi.”

Why Didn’t Tesla Do This Years Ago?

Tesla may have waited too long to file a trademark for the term “Robotaxi.” While the company has been discussing a self-driving fleet since 2016, the concept of autonomous taxis has gained a lot more traction in recent years — and competitors like Uber have also begun using the term.

We suspect there was some strategic timing behind these filings. Earlier versions of FSD — particularly those prior to V12 — may have lacked the progress needed to support Tesla’s robotaxi ambitions. Filing for a trademark that isn’t actively in use or about to be used can make it harder to defend or retain.

Moreover, while the idea of autonomous vehicles has been around for years, a clearer public understanding of Tesla’s specific plans has only emerged over the past 18 months. Filing too early can trigger speculation long before the company is ready to reveal details.

Ultimately, whether Tesla secures the rights to “Robotaxi” remains uncertain — but trademarks like “Cybercab” and “Robovan” seem much more likely to stick.

Tesla Launches AI Agent to Improve Tesla Service Communications

By Karan Singh
Not a Tesla App

One of Tesla’s greatest weaknesses, as it has quickly become one of the world’s most ubiquitous cars on the planet has always been service. Escalating issues to managers and sometimes even reaching a Tesla Service employee can be a total coin flip, depending on your Service Center.

Tesla is continuing its push to integrate AI across its customer support channels in an effort to improve customer service. According to Raj Jegannathan, Tesla’s VP for IT, AI Infrastructure, Apps, Infosecurity, and Vehicle Service Operations (that’s a lot), Tesla is launching a pilot program for a new AI designed to improve customer interactions with Service.

This new initiative follows other recent AI deployments across Tesla’s customer-facing channels, including the personalized AI assistant within the Tesla App, the ability to ask questions to AI on Tesla’s website, and the biggest one, the new voice-based AI customer representative introduced for Tesla Insurance.

Proactive AI Support

At 10 pilot service locations, this new AI agent will begin working behind the scenes at Tesla Service, to help with customer communications. It will provide three key features:

Detect Communications Delays: The AI will actively monitor service interactions to identify potential delays in communication or progress. These are often a key pain point for customers who reach out to Tesla Service and don’t receive a response for several days, as Service has nothing new to add. The AI can now step in and let the customer know Tesla is still waiting on parts or something else.

Monitor Customer Sentiment: By monitoring the tone and content of the messages between the customer and Service agents, Tesla will be able to identify situations where a customer might be dissatisfied or facing difficulties.

Auto-Escalate: If either a communications delay or negative sentiment is detected, the AI can automatically escalate issues to human managers for review. This helps to address problems before customers need to seek escalation themselves or become upset about an issue.

Customer Escalation Requests

Alongside the new AI tool, Tesla is also introducing a more direct way for customers to get higher-level attention. According to Tesla, within the next two weeks, customers can simply type “Escalate” in order to have their issue routed directly to management.

Raj’s team is currently working on implementing guardrails to prevent abuse, but this will soon make its way to improving Tesla’s service offerings. We’re glad to see Tesla taking steps to identify and correct deficiencies in the process - it has always been a sore tooth for Tesla in the last few years.

Latest Tesla Update

Confirmed by Elon

Take a look at features that Elon Musk has said will be coming soon.

More Tesla News

Tesla Videos

Latest Tesla Update

Confirmed by Elon

Take a look at features that Elon Musk has said will be coming soon.

Subscribe

Subscribe to our weekly newsletter