Tesla's LFP (iron) batteries compared. Which one should you buy?

By Henry Farkas

For the first time, you have a choice of battery for your new Tesla. Not battery size, you've always had that choice. Now you have a choice of which chemical elements you want. Here are some thoughts about how you can choose intelligently. It all depends on your financial situation, your plans for long-distance travel, and the geography of your area.

Tesla's Iron and Nickel based batteries

Elon Musk explains Tesla's LFP Battery strategy for US Model 3 SR+.

There's a delay in delivery times for the Model 3 SR+. This is August 2021. Delivery dates are some time in 2022. If you're buying one of the more expensive models or one of the bigger battery sizes, you can take delivery sooner, but the Model 3 SR+ might be the one you want. It's the one I bought. I knew that road trips would take a bit longer with the shorter-range battery since I'd have to pull off the road to charge more often. So far, I haven't had the opportunity to take a multi-day road trip. There's a pandemic after all. But I knew that would eventually become an issue. I really like road trips. But I have to say, even when I took lots of road trips, most of my driving was local.

Had I opted for the long-range Model 3, I'd have paid an extra ten thousand dollars in order to get 90 miles of extra range. That extra ninety miles of range would come into play only 30 or 40 days each year, and the time it would save me would be about an hour each day of a multi-day road trip. It didn't make financial sense.

Now that Tesla is experiencing the same production delays as are all the other auto manufacturers, they're giving their shorter delivery dates to buyers of the more expensive, read higher profit, models. But they're making an exception and giving shorter delivery dates if you buy a Tesla with an LFP battery rather than an NCA battery.

So what's the difference? Both batteries are actually lithium-ion batteries. They both use lithium. So that's not a difference. But the NCA battery uses nickel, cobalt, and aluminum in addition to lithium. The LFP battery uses Iron and Phosphate (phosphorus combined with oxygen) in addition to lithium. The main differences for you to consider are that the LFP battery has a slightly shorter range, 253 miles, as opposed to the NCA battery, 263 miles. But that slight difference in range is deceptive. The NCA battery probably shouldn't be charged to 100%. Fully charging the battery causes damage to the battery making it likely to deteriorate over the years of ownership. It's perfectly fine to charge the LFP battery to 100% so the driver experience is pretty much the same except for a couple caveats.

Iron and Nickel based batteries cost comparison

The LFP battery is heavier. That's why the range is slightly lower on the ordinary battery test cycle. The extra weight causes extra rolling resistance. That's why the range is reduced. There's probably also some extra wear on the tires. The problems of extra weight and extra rolling resistance are probably not all that bothersome for most drivers.

But, if you live in an area where there are lots of hills so that you're changing your elevation every time you drive, you're going to notice a much more pronounced decrease in range with the heavier LFP battery. You can experience the difference more intimately by getting a wagon or a wheelbarrow. Roll it around on level ground. Then put a heavy object in it and roll it around some more. You'll notice a bit more rolling resistance, but you'll be able to deal with the extra rolling resistance easily.

Now do that same experiment on a hill. Pull the wagon or push the wheelbarrow up the hill empty. No problem, right? Then put in the heavy object and go up the hill again. Big difference. Your car feels the same way. You'll get a bit of extra regenerative braking going down the hill with the heavier battery, but it won't be enough to make up the difference. The second law of thermodynamics causes that. That pesky high school physics topic, entropy, strikes again.

LFP batteries are also much more environmentally friendly.

There's also one more issue, cold weather.

LFP batteries charge more slowly in cold weather than NCA batteries and their range decreases somewhat more than NCA batteries in cold weather. Keep in mind that both NCA and LFP do worse in cold weather. It's just that LFP batteries get more of a cold weather effect than NCA batteries. When you're on a road trip and navigating to a Supercharger, your car will prewarm its batteries. That will alleviate the slower charging problem to some extent, but you'll be at the Supercharger six or seven minutes longer in winter with LFP batteries. That will be a problem if you plan to use your car in such a way as to need to do lots of cold weather supercharging. It won't matter at all if you're just going to charge your car overnight in your garage.

So flatlanders will be fine with the LFP battery. If you live in a hilly area, you may want to wait for the NCA-equipped Tesla Model 3 SR+. But remember, the lower range problem is only a problem for people planning to do lots of mountain driving. In that case, you actually ought to invest the extra $10K in the long range Model 3.

One last issue about the LFP battery. Remember, earlier in this article, I mentioned that you shouldn't fill the NCA battery up to 100% charge, but you should fill the LFP battery up to 100%? That's true at home, but it's not true on road trips. On road trips, you want to minimize the amount of time you're stopped. The way to do that is to never charge the battery to 100% no matter which kind of battery you have. When you plug your car in at a modern high voltage supercharger, you'll see your car adding four to five hundred miles per hour of connection. That doesn't mean you'll be up to 100% in a half hour. You won't. As the battery gets charged, the rate of charge drops significantly for both the LFP and the NCA batteries. Once you get above 80%, the battery charges very slowly. So figure out how much charge you need to get you to the next place you're going to charge up and give yourself enough charge to get you there with a twenty or thirty mile cushion. Charging your battery more than that is a waste of time. Your travel time.

Tesla's Battery Day

Musk Teases Major Improvements to FSD — Is Version 14 on the Way?

By Karan Singh
Not a Tesla App

Following a period of radio silence from Tesla on FSD updates, Elon Musk has finally hinted that progress is continuing behind the scenes on FSD and that “Several major improvements are incoming.” We’re pretty excited - it has been over 100 days since the last FSD update, and we haven’t heard much since then.

The latest versions of FSD were V13.2.8 for AI4 vehicles and V12.6.2 for HW3 vehicles, both of which were released in January of this year — almost four months ago. While development has been ongoing internally, many have been wondering what the next public release will be. Will it be FSD V13.3, or will we jump straight to FSD V14.

Decoupled Releases & Spring Update

Tesla has now begun pushing Early Access users the 2025 Spring Update without an FSD version change. This means that we can expect the next FSD update to likely be based on the 2025.14 branch.

It’s worth noting that Tesla can add improvements to FSD at any time - and sometimes they do make minor changes without incrementing release numbers - small flag changes in FSD’s software to address how it does a specific task, or what data is uploaded.

With all that said, we expect the Spring Update to begin going out to more of the fleet in the coming days. We’re currently seeing about 58% of the fleet on the Spring Update, and only 30% of the fleet on the older 2025.8 January Update.

Update 2025.14.3.1

FSD Supervised 12.6.4 & 13.2.8
Installed on 31.2% of fleet
2,315 Installs today
Last updated: May 7, 3:55 am UTC

Cybertruck FSD

Not A Tesla App received information that an upcoming update was set to bring features from other AI4 vehicles to the Cybertruck, including Start FSD from Park, Unpark, Actually Smart Summon, and more. This update was intended to bring it closer to feature parity with the rest of Tesla’s AI4 fleet, but for now, Cybertruck remains the redheaded stepchild of the fleet.

We’re still confident that Tesla is working on this, and the continued delays on the release of an FSD update could point to the Cybertruck and a lack of data continuing to be a pain point for Tesla’s AI team. Cybertruck owners, including the author, have noted that FSD-equipped Cybertrucks continue to upload several hundred gigabytes or more of data per month. This topped out at nearly 1.9 TB of data uploaded in April 2025 for the author.

That’s a massive amount of data - and other users on social media have mentioned much the same for their own Cybertrucks. Tesla needs as much data as possible to tune the FSD models, and given the small fleet size for the Cybertruck, it requires a vast amount of data per user.

“Major Improvements”

While Elon didn’t mention what constitutes these major improvements, we have a lot of expectations besides what we know about the Cybertruck. Learning from the recent and successful FSD launch in China, Tesla is now able to utilize a more generalized model without specific local training data. This could potentially translate into better performance in North America as well, as the 7.7 million miles globally driven on FSD every day are feeding back into Tesla’s data loop.

We’re hopeful that future improvements continue to focus on improving tracking and decision-making, as well as lane handling. FSD users on X continue to point out issues with lane selection and lane keeping in the latest versions of FSD. On the flipside, Tesla has greatly increased the comfort and smoothness of FSD - and V13 is a prime example of that.

While V13.2.8  is also capable of pulling into parking stalls both forwards and in reverse (thanks to one of those flag changes recently), it does an oddly poor job of parking. Tesla’s Vision Autopark, on the other hand, is exceptionally accurate, even with big vehicles like the Cybertruck. It feels like Tesla is working on the parking lot stack to prepare for the upcoming launch of Robotaxi in June.

What About FSD V14

Back in the Q4 2024 Earnings Call, we heard about FSD V14, and just learned a little bit of what will make it unique. In this case, it's auto-regressive transformers that will improve FSD’s already powerful perception system and help it to predict better how other vehicles and road users will behave around it.

That, alongside a larger model and increased context size, will help FSD manage edge cases and make better decisions. The larger model and context size increases are likely another challenge for Tesla, which is already pushing the hardware limits of AI4 with FSD V13.

We did a deep dive into what we know about V14, which you can read here.

Tesla Introduces Acceleration Boost for Refreshed Model Y

By Karan Singh
@MatthewDR on X

The non-Launch Edition version of the refreshed Model Y began shipping just a few weeks ago. One of the few things you couldn’t get that the Launch Edition came with was the Acceleration Boost. Tesla wasted no time with this vehicle and is now offering Long Range AWD owners the option to purchase Acceleration Boost.

Tesla didn’t offer a Launch Edition version of the new Model 3 when it launched in 2024. While Acceleration Boost is now available for the new Model 3, it remains restricted to the Asian-Pacific market. It’s not clear why it’s not available in other regions, but it’s possible it could be due to battery chemistries.

Boost Now

Acceleration Boost is an option that has generally been offered for most Model 3 and Model Y Long Range Dual Motor variants, providing excellent performance for the price. A vehicle with Acceleration Boost places the vehicle somewhere between the regular Long Range variant and the Performance version.

In the Refreshed Model Y’s case, Acceleration Boost cuts the official 0-60 mph (0-100 km/h) time from 4.6 seconds down to 4.2 seconds, adding a hefty boost. This is achieved by unlocking approximately 100 additional horsepower from the drivetrain through software.

That 4.2-second time is also 0.1 seconds faster than the rated 0-60 on the original Model Y with Acceleration Boost, so it’s another generational improvement right there.

Cost & Availability

Acceleration Boost is priced at the standard $2,000 USD - and will eventually become available in most global markets for that equivalent price. The upgrade is available now in the United States and Canada ($2,700 CAD), and should hopefully be available globally within the next few days.

Owners can purchase Acceleration Boost through the Tesla mobile app from Upgrades > Software Upgrades > Acceleration Boost, or through the vehicle touchscreen from Controls > Upgrades, provided that In-Car Upgrades are enabled (set in the Tesla App).

The vehicle will need a network connection to process the configuration update, which only takes a few minutes. During the configuration update procedure, the vehicle will not be drivable and will reboot.

Eligibility

It is important to note that the Long Range Rear-Wheel Drive (RWD) variant, which is available in Europe and Asia-Pacific, is not eligible for this upgrade as it lacks the necessary dual-motor configuration.

Owners of the Launch Edition already have this feature by default and won’t need to purchase it.

No Track Mode

If you’re hungering for Track Mode and all the functionality it offers, we recommend waiting for Tesla to release the Performance variant of the Refreshed Model Y. While Elon did mention in the past that Acceleration Boost would grant access to Track Mode, it hasn’t happened quite yet.

Is It Worth It?

Acceleration Boost helps to bridge the gap between the Performance variant and the Long Range AWD variant, offering quicker acceleration without the need to opt for the dedicated and more expensive Performance variant.

This is especially so today, where the Refreshed Model Y Performance hasn’t been announced yet - so if you’ve already purchased a Long Range AWD and want to go just a bit faster, this is a fantastic option at a good value.

The difference in acceleration is noticeably faster, just like Acceleration Boost with the original Model Y. If you really want to take off a little faster or want to take the vehicle to the track, this will definitely be a worthwhile upgrade.

Tesla hasn’t noted a reduced range with this upgrade, similar to the refreshed Model 3’s Acceleration Boost. Older models had about a 5% range loss due to the additional always-available acceleration and cooling requirements.

This is one of Tesla’s most popular upgrades due to its relatively low cost while also adding some additional value to the vehicle.

Latest Tesla Update

Confirmed by Elon

Take a look at features that Elon Musk has said will be coming soon.

More Tesla News

Tesla Videos

Latest Tesla Update

Confirmed by Elon

Take a look at features that Elon Musk has said will be coming soon.

Subscribe

Subscribe to our weekly newsletter