Elon Musk's Fiery Response to Delaware Court Ruling: Tesla's Future and Musk's Influence Hang in the Balance

January 31, 2024

By Kevin Armstrong

Musk $55.8 billion compensation package rescinded

Not a Tesla App

In the wake of the Delaware Chancery Court's landmark decision to rescind his $55.8 billion compensation package, Elon Musk did not hold back on expressing his views. Taking to X, Musk's posts resonated with a blend of frustration, defiance, and contemplation of Tesla's future.

This is insulting to shareholders
— Elon Musk (@elonmusk) January 31, 2024

Musk called the decision "insulting to shareholders." Furthermore, Musk's suggestion to avoid incorporation in Delaware and his query about relocating Tesla's incorporation to Texas echo his discontent and hint at a potential strategic shift.

Unfathomable Compensation and Controlled Mindset

The 201 page Delaware Court's decision, as articulated by Judge Kathaleen St. J. McCormick, delved deep into the complexities of Musk's compensation package and the process behind its approval. The judge described the package as an "unfathomable sum," highlighting its sheer magnitude and deviation from standard executive compensation practices.

Central to the court's ruling was the notion that Musk exerted undue influence over Tesla's board of directors. The court found that Musk's control over the board and his relationships with its members significantly compromised their ability to act independently. According to the ruling, this control resulted in a compensation negotiation process that lacked objectivity and transparency.

In her ruling, McCormick noted, "Musk had extensive ties with the persons tasked with negotiating on Tesla’s behalf." She pointed out the conflicts inherent in this arrangement, emphasizing the need for a more rigorous standard in such situations. "The process leading to the approval of Musk’s compensation plan was deeply flawed," she wrote, highlighting the controlled mindset of the board and its failure to recognize the conflict of interest.

Shareholder Disenfranchisement and Material Omissions

Another critical aspect of the court's decision was the inadequate information provided to shareholders during the vote on Musk's compensation. The ruling emphasized the omission of material information about potential conflicts of interest and the overall negotiation process, which were crucial for shareholders to make an informed decision.

"The record establishes that the Proxy failed to disclose the Compensation Committee members’ potential conflicts and omitted material information concerning the process," the court observed. This lack of transparency was seen as a significant factor in the decision to overturn the package, indicating that Tesla shareholders were not equipped with all the necessary information to make an informed choice.

Musk's compensation was initially perceived as a step toward a "good future for humanity," including ambitions like colonizing Mars, but the judgment stated, “Some might question whether colonizing Mars is the logical next step. But, in all events, that “get” had no relation to Tesla’s goals with the compensation plan.” The court's analysis highlighted that the package's extraordinary size was disconnected from the automaker's objectives.

Stepping back to 2017

The court's narrative begins with Musk's own words, extracted from a 2017 email, where he expressed confidence that Tesla shareholders would be "super happy" with the compensation plan. Musk believed that the package would be perceived positively, projecting an "ultra-bullish view of the future" and symbolizing his commitment to ensuring a "good future for humanity." This ambition, while laudable, was disconnected from the immediate operational goals of Tesla, according to the court.

Emails from Musk during the compensation discussions in 2017 reveal his desire for a significant increase in Tesla ownership upon reaching a $550 billion valuation. He suggested a structure that would effectively boost his ownership stake, considering future dilutions, to around 25% over a decade, underscoring his long-term vision for Tesla. It also underscores the lack of a succession plan that exists to this day.

Testimonies from key Tesla figures like Ira Ehrenpreis and Antonio Gracias provided insight into the compensation committee's approach. They emphasized a subjective sense of fairness and collaboration with Musk, rather than objective market data or arm's length negotiations. This approach was echoed by Todd Maron, Tesla's general counsel, who described the process as cooperative and collaborative, lacking a recognized conflict of interest.

Musk's Recent Compensation Discussion

Two weeks before the court's decision, Musk discussed on X his engagement with Tesla and future compensation plans. An X user expressed concerns about Musk's apparent lack of a new incentive plan since completing his 2018 compensation milestones. In response, Musk's four-word reply, "That would be nice," hinted at his openness to discussing future compensation aligned with his contributions and ambitions in AI, automation, and space exploration.

Musk later elaborated on his desire for approximately 25% voting control within Tesla, which he believes is substantial yet not overwhelming. This statement came amidst Musk's concerns over his influence in the company, especially in growing Tesla as a leader in AI and robotics. On the same day as the ruling Musk posted an update on Tesla’s robot.

Going for a walk with Optimus pic.twitter.com/6mLJCUp30F
— Elon Musk (@elonmusk) January 31, 2024

Musk & Tesla's Future and Potential Move to Texas

Musk's suggestion of moving Tesla's incorporation to Texas, where its physical headquarters are located, has stirred discussions about the company's future corporate structure. Relating to Texas, known for its business-friendly environment, could be a strategic response to the legal and corporate challenges Tesla faces in Delaware.

Should Tesla change its state of incorporation to Texas, home of its physical headquarters?
— Elon Musk (@elonmusk) January 31, 2024

This potential move raises questions about the implications for Tesla's governance, legal framework, and operational strategy. A shift to Texas could signal a new chapter for Tesla as it navigates through the fallout of the court's decision and reevaluates its position in the corporate landscape.

Despite focusing on voting control and compensation, Musk's vision for Tesla extends beyond financial incentives. He is keen on advancing significant developments in AI and robotics, aiming to position Tesla at the forefront of technological innovation. This aligns with his broader goals of advancing human progress through technology.

Tesla Q1 Update on Optimus, Batteries, and Tesla Energy

May 1, 2025

By Karan Singh

Not a Tesla App

The 2025 Q1 Earnings Call gave us the opportunity to learn about a lot of things, from Unsupervised FSD, to the Robotaxi program, to the update on the more affordable model. There was a lot of news to unpack, but there’s still more.

In this article, we’ll cover Tesla’s updates on Optimus, batteries, and Tesla Energy.

Optimus

Tesla has been working away on their humanoid robot and continues to make progress in software and hardware.

First, Tesla is preparing the Fremont factory for the Optimus pilot production line, which is scheduled for completion later this year. Once it is, wider deployments of Optimus for internal use within Tesla’s facilities are expected as well. Tesla aims to have several thousand Optimus units working in its North American factories by the end of the year once the pilot production line is operational.

Tesla’s goals for production remain extremely lofty - 1 million units per year by 2030. However, they could face some challenges when ramping production.

Key components like the shoulder actuators use specialized permanent and rare-earth magnets, which are currently sourced from China. Due to recent Chinese restrictions on the overseas sale of these magnets, Tesla is seeking an exemption or alternative suppliers. They have not yet looked into modifying the shoulder actuator but will likely do so if they cannot obtain the necessary materials.

Batteries

Batteries are another item that Tesla’s teams have been working on behind the scenes for years now. The second generation of the 4680 - the Cybercell - has been IRA-compliant for some time now. This means that the Cybertruck is eligible for the US Federal EV rebate.

Tesla also achieved the lowest cost-per-kWh of any of its cells with the 4680 battery - and it is potentially one of the cheapest cells being manufactured by any vehicle battery manufacturer at this point. With dry-cathode still being worked on, Tesla may be able to squeeze more optimizations and cost efficiencies from the 4680 cells.

Additionally, Tesla is progressing with its plans for lithium refining and cathode production in the US, both of which are scheduled to commence in 2025. While the company says they’re no longer supply-constrained for non-LFP vehicle batteries, on-shoring production and sourcing critical minerals from nations outside of China will be key.

LFP batteries continue to be supplied-constrained - namely for the Tesla Energy division. LFP batteries and their materials are sourced from China. Due to tariffs and limited exports, Tesla is can’t obtain enough and is considering potentially building an LFP production facility in North America.

Energy

Tesla’s energy division is still experiencing some of the highest growth of any of its divisions. Year over year, Tesla saw a 154% increase in energy storage deployments, including both Megapack and Powerwall - for a total of 10.4 GWh deployed in just Q1 2025. While deliveries in energy storage remain volatile due to the nature of Megapack installations, Tesla expects growth to continue rapidly in this segment.

Tesla also deployed 1GWh of Powerwall 3 residential storage this quarter, marking its strongest quarter. Powerwall 3 has received positive feedback from customers, many of whom appreciate its new capabilities with its built-in inverter for solar.

Megapack is continuing to see demand increases, currently highlighted by utility-scale Megapack systems, as well as data centers requiring stable power delivery. Megafactory Shanghai is also online now and producing Megapacks - with an annual production capacity of 20GWh today and up to 40GWh in the future. The site has also produced over 100 Megapacks this quarter, which are all awaiting delivery.

There was a lot of interesting news from Tesla’s Q1 2025 Earnings Call, covering everything from FSD and Robotaxi - to the less glamorous but equally important Megapack and Powerwall.

Tesla Introduces AI-Powered Phone Support for Tesla Insurance, Reducing Wait Times and Cutting Costs

May 1, 2025

By Karan Singh

Not a Tesla App

Tesla is heavily leaning into artificial intelligence, and its insurance offering is just another example of how it’s improving its product or lowering costs by leveraging AI.

Tesla recently started offering an insurance discount in select states when drivers use FSD for at least 50% of their drives and now it’s introducing an AI to help handle customer claims.

Tesla has developed an in-house voiced AI agent that can assist customers in handling simple support requests for Tesla Insurance.

Although Tesla Insurance is currently available in just 12 U.S. states, its voice AI assistant is accessible via phone across all supported states.

What the AI is Doing

For customers calling in from those states, the new AI agent provides a unique way to address the most common support calls. And it’s not just answering common questions but actually making requested changes to the owner’s account.

Policy Changes

The first key item is that it automates policy changes. Simple policy updates, including adjusting your deductible or coverage limits, are now done via AI. For policyholders who are simply looking to make quick changes and don’t have any questions, this makes the process a lot quicker by not having to wait for a representative. Tesla isn’t eliminating representatives, but this could reduce the number of representatives required or reduce wait times.

Continue Where You Left Off

The second item here, highlighted by Raj Jegannathan from Tesla’s internal IT team, is that Tesla’s AI agent is able to offer summaries of the user’s last interaction with Tesla Insurance. It will summarize your last interaction and provide assistance on that particular topic if you need to continue it. That means that you don’t have to wait for a human to review your file - the AI will kick off right where you left off.

Tesla appears to be focused on improving efficiency and making support more accessible. While actual items like claims are left up to humans due to their inherently complex nature, this helps free up employees to handle more complex items. While there’s no doubt Tesla will continue to develop this AI like they do everything else, we may soon see it take on even more tasks.

More AI

This isn’t the first AI agent that Tesla has demoed - there is now a chat-based AI sales agent available on the front page of Tesla’s website, which is able to answer common questions on Tesla vehicles.

Tesla has also been improving their AI support tool available in the Tesla App is able to provide feedback on common issues and also guide users towards either solving the problem or placing a support request.

Tesla has recently updated this AI to offer personalized support, allowing you to ask questions such as ‘What are my vehicle service alerts?’ or ‘Does my vehicle have a heat pump?’

Tesla’s strategy here is to influence the cost-heavy areas associated with having humans address simple requests and instead leverage AI, which can offer instant answers and reduce support costs.

Roll Out to More States

While this new AI is currently limited to just 12 states, it is likely to follow Tesla Insurance’s expansion. Insurance seems to have been at a bit of a standstill lately. Tesla continues to improve features such as the improvements to Safety Score V2.2, but we haven’t seen Tesla roll out support to new states since it added Minnesota in November of 2022.

Tesla may be looking to lower costs and refine the experience before it expands to additional states.