Why not using the left scroll (at least optionally) for turning arrows?
I do like the removal of stalks, first of all. What I don't get is why they felt the need to stack the left and right arrow buttons, which is totally illogical (try setting an arrow during a turn without looking at them... reversing left/right comes intuitively, but which one was on top and now is at the bottom, even worse when ad odd angles?).
A simple solution would have been using one of the two scroll buttons, moving less frequent functions like the autopilot distance to such an illogical positioning.
But obviously the best solution would have been just copying other carmakers who have nailed this already, having one arrow on each side, or at least positioning them on a row and moving the lights button where now the left arrow is.
I don't know, seems like they released a hardware interface, surely replaceable but at a cost, with the same nonchalance that could be dedicated to the software interface, where experiments are more possible.
I do like the removal of stalks, first of all. What I don't get is why they felt the need to stack the left and right arrow buttons, which is totally illogical (try setting an arrow during a turn without looking at them... reversing left/right comes intuitively, but which one was on top and now is at the bottom, even worse when ad odd angles?).
A simple solution would have been using one of the two scroll buttons, moving less frequent functions like the autopilot distance to such an illogical positioning.
But obviously the best solution would have been just copying other carmakers who have nailed this already, having one arrow on each side, or at least positioning them on a row and moving the lights button where now the left arrow is.
I don't know, seems like they released a hardware interface, surely replaceable but at a cost, with the same nonchalance that could be dedicated to the software interface, where experiments are more possible.