Discuss: Rivian Adds Waze Integration, Should Tesla Follow Suit?

[Not a Tesla App]

Rivian is bringing Waze alerts to its navigation system, while Tesla owners have spent years requesting direct Waze functionality on their center touchscreens Read More

Rivian Adds Waze Integration, Should Tesla Follow Suit? - Not a Tesla App

Rivian is bringing Waze alerts to its navigation system, while Tesla owners have spent years requesting direct Waze functionality on their center touchscreens

www.notateslaapp.com

 

[TESLASUPERFAN]

Well this is a NO BRAINER-we have all been waiting for this for a long time........but not if its another subscription.

Don't understand why the RIV is ahead of the TES on this feature, defies logic.

 

[Procal]

Easy answer, yes. I've been saying it for ages; I don't understand why Tesla doesn't do some sort of Waze integration on their navigation interface, or if they don't want to partner with Waze/Google, at least do their own integration. Basically every major map service (Google Maps, Waze, Apple Maps, etc.) offers some sort of reporting feature nowadays, and it is odd that Tesla, with its cutting-edge tech, still doesn't offer it. They could even go as far as allowing users to manually report things like incorrect speed limit signs or school zone recognition so that FSD can better adhere to the speed limit. Even things like no right on red or other specialty signs that are time-of-day dependent could be reported and made better if they would allow something like this in their vehicles.

 

[Procal]

Ya thanks for not seeing my post which summarizes what you said days BEFORE.

The inherit disadvantages of blocking: miss a little = miss a lot or a dollar short and a day behind.

You aren't blocked. I read what you said and added to it; that is how a forum works. I shared my opinion the same way you shared yours. If you don't like it, then simply don't interact. I don't understand why you come here just to be combative/abrasive/contradictory. Are you really that bored? Having different opinions is fine, but the way you interact with others is that part that I, and I'm sure others, don't like. You should really try to improve that; you can disagree and still be civil and less abrasive.

 

[Procal]

As for what others think, I am not clairvoyant and don’t profess to know what each individual thoughts are. I was under the understanding that people were allowed to think for themselves instead of just allowing a “spokesperson” to relay their thoughts.

I may be incorrect but those are my thoughts. The good news is I’m at 82% charge level

No one asked you to be clairvoyant or "compliant" or to stop thinking for yourself. Those are all things you've introduced into the conversation yourself.

My point was much simpler: I replied to the same topic, agreed with part of what you said, and expanded on it. Your immediate response was to sarcastically accuse me of ignoring you because you had commented first. That's the abrasive behavior I was referring to. Disagree with me all you want; I have no issue with that. But someone adding their own thoughts to a discussion doesn't invalidate yours, nor does your having posted first invalidate theirs.

 

[Procal]

so I cut n pasted what you wrote and I'll explain YOUR ERROR.

YOU-"The way you interact with others is that part that I, and I'm sure others, don't like".

ME " I am not clairvoyant and don’t profess to know what each individual thoughts are"

THE ERROR-you seem to know what others think, U stated you are sure what others think, U are a spokesperson for others which I never knew otherwise that statement is incorrect........yet another error.

MY thoughts-I refrain from speaking on others behalf, I refrain from telling individuals what I dont like about them, I am not a child in grade school. As for being abrasive and hostile-my response is OPIONIONS VARY !.

You’re taking an ordinary figure of speech absurdly literally in order to manufacture an “error” that isn’t there. When someone says “I’m sure others feel the same way,” they are expressing a reasonable inference that they probably aren’t the only person with that reaction. It does not mean they are clairvoyant, have polled every member of the forum, or have appointed themselves anyone’s “spokesperson.” I would have thought that distinction was obvious.

And once again, you’re changing the subject. I never criticized you for having a different opinion. “Opinions vary” is therefore irrelevant. I criticized the way you interact with people—the sarcasm, the condescension, and the unnecessary hostility. Your original response to me wasn’t “I disagree with your opinion”; it was a sarcastic complaint that I had supposedly ignored your post simply because I added my own thoughts to the same discussion.

You also say you “refrain from telling individuals what you don’t like about them,” as though that somehow disproves anything I said. You don’t have to explicitly announce “here is what I dislike about you” to behave abrasively toward someone. Your last several responses are examples of exactly what I was referring to.

So no, the issue was never that you think for yourself, that your opinions differ, or that you aren’t “compliant.” Those are arguments you created yourself. The issue is that you seem to turn an ordinary forum discussion into a confrontation when somebody replies in a way you don’t like. That was my point before, and your response here hasn’t changed it.

 

[VoodooPriest]

Oh...the regression of ALL message boards, eventually, before they are simply shut down.

 

[TESLASUPERFAN]

Yup-it’s argumentative-pointless and expressing your dis-like for individuals is miopic at best. Are there people I don’t like on the planet sure-would I post that in a forum absolutely not.

Any ways-moving on seems Tesla/Apple will eventually come up with something. Hopefully we will get something just in time for Christmas update.