Discuss: Trump Says EV Drivers Are Crazy, Have a 'Disease'

Procal

Well-known member
Jun 12, 2024
758
751
93
Thank you for stating this part in particular very clearly and in an easily understandable way.
Despite repeated rally claims, no federal law ever required that American consumers buy an EV by 2030. The executive actions Trump referenced actually targeted federal tailpipe emission standards and state-level clean air regulations that encouraged automakers to make more EVs.

Now imagine where the U.S. EV industry could be in 2030 if manufacturers were able to continue to operate in a stable policy environment that consistently encouraged investment in these platforms. I don't think the US would suddenly pass China; its lead is far too entrenched for that, but maybe the gap would be much narrower. Instead, we are seeing a very uneven response from the manufacturers. Some are heavily invested in dedicated EV platforms, while others have scaled back, delayed, or cancelled programs as the policy and demand environment has evolved. Even Toyota and Lexus are still behind charging technology Hyundai and Kia have had on the market for years, even if they’ve made huge strides with their 2026 BEVs. And not every American manufacturer that’s focused on EVs is necessarily pushing every part of the technology at the same pace. Take Tesla’s core range. It still lacks the higher voltage architecture and charging performance that a host of Chinese, European, and South Korean competitors offer. There are exceptions, Lucid arguably among them, but generally Chinese manufacturers have built up huge advantages in battery manufacturing, cost, supply-chain integration, and time to get new technology into production. This is why I believe the US is in danger of falling even further behind in key areas of the EV industry. The problem is not just one emissions policy being reversed but the cumulative effect of inconsistent long-term policy, political polarization around EVs, manufacturers scaling back investment, and an overseas industry that is not slowing down. Rolling back policies to expedite electrification certainly doesn’t help that competitiveness, nor does it help reduce transportation’s dependence on petroleum and exposure to the global oil markets.
 
Last edited:

TESLASUPERFAN

Active member
Aug 27, 2024
768
92
28
Canada/USA
www.youtube.com
It’s statements like these that setback the EV industry. Creating more hatred, more chance for vandalism, etc.

I see this mentality will grow as personal robots arrive in homes.

Bragging about USA has more oil-increasing their carbon footprint on mother earth is such ignorance. How many more years do he have left in office ?
 
  • Like
Reactions: ALIEN SUPERSTAR

Bjarkeh

Member
Sep 20, 2024
30
31
18
I’m sad about the way things are going over there right now, I’d like to see more US EVs in the EU.

I’m still hoping Rivian will bring their R3 over here when/if it’s released, I could well see it as a potential next car for me, if Tesla doesn’t bring out anything new
 

Procal

Well-known member
Jun 12, 2024
758
751
93
Anyone wanna guess how many EV plates are gonna be requested with 'DISEASED' on them. I might just do that myself. Were I more savvy I'd make money on that idea on Polymarket or something.
I'm already working on a 3D-printed license plate frame to put on my Model 3, lol! Getting a new and custom license plate in my state is a bit laborious and costs quite a bit of money, so I can't go down that route.